PTI Committed to Resolve Matter Politically

An incident happened on 9th May in response to the arrest of the founder of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, Imran Khan. Imran Khan reached the Islamabad High Court for biometrics to contest his cases in the relevant court. Khan was arrested on the premises of Islamabad High Court by the Rangers in the Toshakhana case. Rangers claimed that they helped National Accountability Bureau (NAB) officials arrest Imran. Lawyers and court officials were injured during the arrest. In addition to that, Imran Khan was in the custody of NAB Rawalpindi in the Toshakhana case. The petition was filed by Khan’s lawyers in the Supreme Court on an urgent basis, and the application was hired by the Supreme Court, and the existing Chief Justice of Pakistan, Umar Atta Bandial, ordered the Islamabad Police to produce the PTI Chairman within the set timeline in the Court. The Supreme Court released him and nullified and voided the NAB stance.

Imran Khan has a strong stance on the May 9 incident and has demanded a neutral investigation to point out the actual details and culprits. It is a day-one demand of Imran after the May 9 incident. He claimed that it was the London plan formula and that PTI workers were not involved in it. The name of Khan is censored, and he is banned by all the media, and nobody reports about him. He plays a mind game to remain under discussion regarding politics and in contact with people and the media. He stated that substantial footage of workers had to be presented of the people involved in the riots. If they belong to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, he will rule them out of the party and present them for punishment. He defended his political workers, stance, and campaign categorically. People rejected the May 9 narrative in general elections, and Khan secured the highest votes. However, the Supreme Court withdrew the party symbol of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, just before the election.

The ruling political parties blamed the PTI for being a foreign-funded party and working closely with foreign powers to destabilise everything in the country. Even though they checked the people’s pulse in the elections on February 8, they did not secure a majority. They were unpopular in the election results, and the popular party was PTI. PDM came into power without the people’s mandate. The true mandate party is the PTI, which is in opposition in the Assembly. The record petition has been filed in elections tribunals by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf to set aside the stolen mandate of the people. The ruling coalition parties are not prepared to defend themselves from the people. They still reiterate the May 9 political narrative, which they used during the general elections and which failed to defeat PTI. Pakistan has a huge youth population, and the majority of youth associate with Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf. The youth proved that the role of electable would end in Pakistan. They will decide their future with the help of voting power.

Moreover, in the aftermath of May 9, they raided the PTI officials and protesters who were involved in the peaceful strike for their leader. All the law enforcement agencies were involved in arresting protesters across Pakistan. Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf claimed that they wanted to destroy the political party that was popular in Pakistan. It was planned to annihilate the party (PTI) to get maximum benefit for the PDM. Khan said that it was London’s plan to mitigate the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf and give power to the PDM.

Furthermore, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf was on the sidelines, and a brutal crackdown was initiated against the party and its supporters. They arrested nearly ten thousand supporters of the party. The aim was to weaken the party and minimise the number of supporters in the coming elections. In this context, the party’s senior leaders were arrested and released on a press release of party withdrawal. The role of the court was limited, and it didn’t manoeuvre its orders. Political instability was in full swing, and popular parties were underwater due to a large-scale crackdown.

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan asserted that he wouldn’t surrender until his last drop of blood and was ready to compete with his opponent. His opponent’s political parties were in danger, posed by Khan’s popularity. They knew that they would not win the elections, and they started election engineering to defame his popularity.

Khan was a former cricketer who used cricket theories in politics and grabbed the ball to clean up his opponents’ politicians with mind games. He knew that he couldn’t contest the elections on the ground physically. He used to play psychological games with political statements and keep close eyes on people’s pulses. The aim was to get people’s support for the slogan campaign. The unpopular decisions of PDM made him more popular in the country, and the coalition adopted a strong policy against Imran Khan, which was an immature decision to tackle his popularity. Political popularity needs political answers, not to open up the front directly. A leader will be famous when he faces hardship, unconstitutional behaviour, false cases, and an immoral attitude. Khan is known as the youth leader of Pakistan, and his ideology penetrates. He succeeded in his mission to get youth support.

Additionally, ‘democracy’ allows freedom of speech and the expression of opinions, which are more important for politicians. Politics is all about speech, expression, opinions, and moral standards. When morality ends, democracy will not survive in the country. It is based on the moral principles of tolerance and compassion for prosperity and development. It is important to understand that democracy is the true face of people who transfer power to representatives peacefully. In the past, they fought for power, and thousands of people were homeless and killed to take power. People had to obey their rulers, whether they liked them or not. In the modern era, people vote for those who have capable and loving personalities. Now, the masses don’t accept dictatorship. Political instability hinders progress and prosperity in Pakistan. Unfortunately, Pakistan failed to achieve its objectives and desired results after Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

Lastly, political instability leads to major crises in the country, and there are many notable examples in the countries of Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. The escalation of conflicts could not be handled when they erupted. Bangladesh was part of Pakistan and separated in 1970 due to political failure. The history of the downfall of countries and nations is an example of Pakistan, and we learnt a lesson from the history. Sometimes, political failure leads to ethnic cleansing and unending problems, which are harmful politically, socially, and economically. It is important to understand that this is a challenging situation and that you have the right to solve problems. Democratic governments are accountable, and answerable in front of people. Those parties are not prepared to fulfil their constitutional and moral objectives and will fail in the country. People will transfer power to other parties, which is a true way to hinder their popularity. The use of power to suppress political parties will become more chronic in the country. Political matters should be resolved politically.